Welcome to World Footy News
Saturday, March 13 2010 @ 02:02 AM EST

Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times

North America

An interesting article about Australian football appeared in the New York Times - in 1910. The historic piece was quoting Major Peixotto, leader of the Pacific Coast Amateur Athletic Union. It dates back to an era when the sporting landscape was vastly different. The professional sporting bodies of today did not exist, and a variety of amateur associations encouraged endeavour across a range of sports, some of which no longer exist - basketball teams even competed in weight divisions.

It seems that Australian football was being exhibited in California and met with enthusiasm. "Practically a similar summing up as that of the major's is the consensus among the Californians who have seen the game as demonstrated as it is now being taught on the coast. Its general absorption of most of the other types of contests with the leather spheroid has proved the rule whenever the issue was football", wrote the Times.

"If we Americans want a safe and sane game of football we can do no better than to emulate the Australian style of game", Major Peixotto says. "It is almost as open as lacrosse, as changeable as basketball, presents almost as many dribbling chances as the association game (soccer), and admits of no such close formations as exist under our college rules..."

He goes on to describe 4 x 25 minute quarters (as they were until recently), the long fields up to "180 yards", crowds of 50,000 to 100,000 per game, 18 players a side, mostly playing one on one (again, as used to be the case before zone defences and floods).

The article came at a time when American football was still only just emerging and was under threat due to fatalities due to crushing head to head contests. Those that mock the padding worn in American football would do well to remember that the sport was nearly banned in the United States due to the number of deaths - good reason to enforce the use of helmets. There was genuine debate in the US as to whether colleges should replace American football with Rugby or soccer.

Apparently a man of the name Eric Cullen Ward was in the US teaching Australian football as part of attempts to encourage its spread, having won a contest in the Sydney public schools system to do this.

The Major described Rugby as obsolete in Australia except for in Sydney, so it is interesting to reflect that somewhere along the way Union and Rugby League managed to push Australian football even further aside from the public (government) system, and it was not until the 1980s and 90s with the emergence of a national league (becoming the AFL) that the impetus to restore Aussie Rules regained momentum.

The full article is here and was brought to our attention via our friends at AFL Samoa.

Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times | 8 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times
Authored by: sfunder on Thursday, November 06 2008 @ 05:28 PM EST
Tragically the administrators of the early 20th century when confronted establishing Aust football or the alternative always chose the latter no matter, as it turns out,repugnant the choice.It happened everywhere bar Australia and candidly the rest of the world is far poorer for it.The AFL simply has to market its game more skilfully than the opposition and hope like hell that with all this hard work its appalling luck starts to change.They have given the opposition at least 100 years start.
All the best
Stephen Funder
Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times
Authored by: flyinghigh on Thursday, November 06 2008 @ 06:35 PM EST
if only sheeds was born hundred yrs ago...he would of won the world over..there would be crys of ball all over the world..thousand cases of leather poisoning recorded by major hospitals all over and no such thing as the statue of liberty... forget the lady holding the flame it would be a ball being plucked from the heavens by jesalenko.........u beauty
Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times
Authored by: Brett on Thursday, November 06 2008 @ 09:46 PM EST

I thought Sheeds was born 100 years ago.

Well, 60 years ago. Apologies to the great international spruiker.

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN

Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times
Authored by: eread on Friday, November 07 2008 @ 07:44 AM EST
I think there are a few factors that kept Australian football out of different places besides bad luck.

1) The English had a natural colonisation attitude and pushed their games - I doubt the Australians thought it was important enough to keep at. If we could go back, the VFA might have moved 50 people to the US to work on the effort - it'd have paid off today.

2) They say the sports people play says a lot about a people (a quote from an American sports writer ridiculing European sports). Certain people wouldn't want to pick up a filthy ball, be tackled at all, think that the coach should run the game from the sidelines, think that the coach definitely shouldn't run the game from the sidelines etc. Some abhor the idea that 99% of the effort ends up for nought (the average soccer game). Some find that thrilling (when the 1% pays off). I have read that the Indians like cricket because they have an aversion to contact sports.

Australian football has huge appeal (and I know that's the point), but some people (peoples?) think it is too unstructured, laugh at how "easy" it is to score etc. That will have impeded the sport before, and will now.

Those points (and there are others) said, it is encouraging that Rugby people are looking to change their rules to improve appeal. I don't think there is much that could be changed about Australian Rules to improve the spectacle - it has been good for 100 years :).

The main problem going forward is going to be history that is cherished between codes. My Kiwi mother has a lot of emotion tied up in the All Blacks and AFL is just too Australian. Like American Football, it is a code tied to the country. I imagine pro-Americans and pro-Australians will like the idea of playing out codes. Anti-* will be more inclined to "world games".

I look forward to the day when we are playing Australian Rules tests.

Evan.
Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times
Authored by: GraemeCarey on Sunday, November 09 2008 @ 03:00 PM EST
On p75 of the book The Australian Game of Football since 1858, a book comissioned to celebrate 150th year of football, occurs one of the few references to international football, viz a letter written in 1906 by the VFL to the President of the United States (who replied!) and the leading Universities of the United States extolling the virtues of our game. That could have been a predecessor to the article above.
It is also interesting to note in 1893, 44 clubs existed in New Zealand (there are24 today) that in 1908 New Zealand participated in the Australasian (note the word) Football Council 1908 carnival and defeated Queensland and New South Wales. The England Rugby tour of 1905-6 which captivated the nation and the advent of World War One effectively killed the game and there were zero clubs by 1920

In the AFL growth area of South Africa, Aussie Rules was first played in 1899 as a result of Australian Army involvement in the Boer War
In 1901, there were over 20 clubs playing competitive football throughout South Africa (wouldn't have had too many black players!)
Between 1906 and 1913 the game was gaining a foothold however at the advent of the 1st World War in 1914, competition ceased, never to be revived.

From 1914 on, because the game was essentially fragmented in Australia with the various state bodies being their own little fiefdoms, and with the rugby codes becoming dominant in NSW and Queensland, international spread was at best a pipe dream.
However, since the advent of the AFL and the successful implementation of a nationwide competition which has rapidly become the dominant spectator sport in the country, such international development does become possible.

However, the AFL, quite rightly in my view, has focused on shoring up the game domestically, through Auskick and indigenous development, but now seems to sufficiently confident in the underpinnings of the game, and is taking some 'baby-steps' internationally.
The last ten years as a result of globalisation and the spread of expats throughout the world has seen the playing of the game likewise spread. This will continue though it will be a slow process and the game may finish up taking a different form (9s?). The AFL knows there will be enough expat disciples and is happy to let them do the work for them whilst providing minimal or no support.This will only change once a demonstrable number of children can be shown to be taking up the game, and a functional junior competition comes into play. As most expats have day jobs and like to stick to their comfort zones this is unlikely, unless initiatives such as the Chris Bandy (see my recent article) AYAID thing come into play.
Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times
Authored by: BeijingBomber on Wednesday, November 12 2008 @ 12:31 AM EST
If history shows us missed opportunities in the developed world, lets not let the same thing happen again in the developing world.

China and India both have no domestic football competitions, barring the corrupt, inept round ball varieties that the locals are sick of. If the AFL really has any desire to succeed overseas then the time is ripe for a big push into these markets.

Lets see some AFL premiership games in both countries, some real investment into junior development (currently only at one AFL Dev officer covering all of China) and have a go at capturing the imagination of the first real generation of young people in these countries that that are looking outwards.
Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times
Authored by: sfunder on Wednesday, November 12 2008 @ 12:56 PM EST
The reply by BeijingBomber regarding International Development of AFL was very intelligent.The opportunities if reported accurately in China and India are immense.However unlike past history they must show uncharacteristic gumption,drive,planning and ambition and not be weighed down by the naysayers,
doomsayers and the small minded suburban pessimists
who have held back AFL to such a degree that it amounted to nothing more than a very successful suburban competition.Start acting instead of contemplating and the popularity of AFL will explode to levels you never thought possible.
Australian Game of Football is Best - New York Times
Authored by: Brett on Wednesday, November 12 2008 @ 04:06 PM EST

Well let's not talk down the game that far (saying it was just a successful suburban competition in one city), although I am a little confused as I think you're using the term AFL interchangeably to refer to either the AFL (the league) and the actual sport Australian football - which is one of many reasons I hate the game being wrongly called AFL, it causes confusion.

But don't let the old VFL propaganda fool you. Australian football was a VERY successful suburban competition in MANY Aussie places, i.e. Melbourne, Perth, Adelaide and Hobart, and a modestly successful one in Brisbane, Darwin and Sydney. It is also embedded in country WA, SA, Vic, Tasmania and southern NSW. It was never contained to just Melbourne. I worry that people will think that the VFL changed its name to the AFL and created non-Victorian teams out of nothing - in most cases they were created and supported by the local leagues that had been around for 100+ years.

The AFL was built on all that success - the TV rights wouldn't have been worth much if the game wasn't already #1 in the other cities, and that was due to the local leagues. But obviously I agree with your point that after 150 years the game should have gone a lot further than it has (otherwise we wouldn't have set up this site).

---
Brett Northey - Co-founder and Chief Editor of WFN